The Answer: Yes, It's Highly Recommended to Avoid Overlapping IP Ranges
Here's why:
- Routing Conflicts:
- If your IPsec VPN tunnel uses the same IP address range as your ISP's CGNAT, you'll create routing conflicts.
- Your computer or network devices won't know whether to send traffic through the VPN tunnel or to the ISP's CGNAT.
- This will result in unpredictable behavior, connectivity problems, and potential security issues.
- Packet Confusion:
- When packets travel through a network, routers rely on IP addresses to determine their destination.
- Overlapping IP ranges can lead to confusion and incorrect routing, causing packets to be lost or delivered to the wrong destination.
- Troubleshooting Nightmares:
- Diagnosing network problems becomes incredibly difficult when IP ranges overlap.
- It's hard to distinguish between issues caused by your VPN and issues caused by the ISP's CGNAT.
How to Avoid Overlapping IP Ranges:
- Choose Private IP Ranges:
- Stick to the standard private IP address ranges defined in RFC 1918:
- 10.0.0.0/8
- 172.16.0.0/12
- 192.168.0.0/16
- Use Unique Subnets:
- Even within the private IP ranges, use unique subnets for your VPN tunnel.
- For example, if your home network uses 192.168.1.1/24, use 10.10.10.0/24 or 172.17.0.0/24 for your VPN tunnel.
- Check ISP Documentation (If Possible):
- Some ISPs might publish information about the IP address ranges they use for CGNAT.
- If you can find this information, avoid those ranges.
- Use less common Private Ranges:
- If you are extra paranoid, you could use a range inside of the 172.16.0.0/12, that is not commonly used by home routers. For example 172.30.0.0/24.
In essence:
- Avoid any IP address ranges that you see in traceroute results when you're behind CGNAT.
- Using standard private IP ranges and unique subnets will help you avoid routing conflicts and ensure a stable VPN connection.